The Observer

Page 1

THE OBSERVER London, Sunday, June 10, 1956 Price 4d. (In the Republic of Ireland, 5d.) Neutralism Obscene, Immoral —DULLES From Our Correspondent WASHINGTON, June 9. MR. DULLES defended his "peace insurance" policy when addressing students from Iowa State College this afternoon. This is the new label for foreign audiences, but the bottle and its contents were familiar. It is doubtful whether any representative of the ordinary community on this subject is done arguments, however sound, will change opinions on this subject. This week's vote in the House of Representatives, which perhaps explores the survival defensive tone of Mr. Dulles' speech, were a sharp reminder that the country required fresh approach if it is to rise to the new situation. The President's remarks on neutralism have conferences at the Vice-President's house of representatives and the Republican Administration of the sort, and the president left the impression that he had arranged for Mr. Dulles to spell out his ideas in more detail to-day. Retreat Completed Instead of the promising feature of the Dulles speech was the control of the policy on neutralism and the brought out of neutralism full circumstances before the President spoke. The White House automated on Thursday had already retracted General Eisenhower's implication that some matters might be safer by remaining neutralist while presidents today Mr. Dulles had already decided that he was neutralist much before the President spoke. The White House automated on Thursday had already retracted General Eisenhower's implication that some matters might be safer by remaining neutralist while presidents today Mr. Dulles had already decided that he was neutralist much before the President spoke. The White House automated on Thursday had already retracted General Eisenhower's implication that some matters might be safer by remaining neutralist while presidents today Mr. Dulles had already decided that he was neutralist much before the President spoke. The White House automated on Thursday had already retracted General Eisenhower's implication that some matters might be safer by remaining neutralist while presidents today Mr. Dulles had already decided that he was neutralist much before the President spoke. The White House automated on Thursday had already retracted General Eisenhower's implication that some matters might be safer by remaining neutralist while presidents today Mr. Dulles had already decided that he was neutralist much before the President spoke. The White House automated on Thursday had already retracted General Eisenhower's implication that some matters might be safer by remaining neutralist while presidents today Mr. Dulles had already decided that he was neutralist much before the President spoke. The White House automated on Thursday had already retracted General Eisenhower's implication that some matters might be safer by remaining neutralist while presidents today Mr. Dulles had already decided that he was ne…