Disputatio apologetica de iure regni Hiberniae pro Catholicis Hibernis adversus haereticos Anglos

A facsimile copy of Conor O’Mahony, ‘Disputatio apologetica de iure regni Hiberniae pro Catholicis Hibernis adversus haereticos Anglos’ ([Dublin: G. Mullen, 1826]). The volume has pasted-in newspaper clippings advertising the edition and offering some contextual information about the author and text. The title page of the volume is a facsimile of the original from 1645. A note from James Coleman FRSAI (dated 1921) relating to the text is also pasted into the volume.

Details

Level of description
Item
Date
1826
Reference
321
Extent and medium
130 pp; printed
Scope and content
A facsimile copy of Conor O’Mahony, ‘Disputatio apologetica de iure regni Hiberniae pro Catholicis Hibernis adversus haereticos Anglos’ ([Dublin: G. Mullen, 1826]). The volume has pasted-in newspaper clippings advertising the edition and offering some contextual information about the author and text. The title page of the volume is a facsimile of the original from 1645. A note from James Coleman FRSAI (dated 1921) relating to the text is also pasted into the volume.
General note
‘Disputatio apologetica de iure regni Hiberniae pro Catholicis Hibernis adversus haereticos Anglos’ (or ‘Explanatory argument concerning the authority of the kingdom of Ireland on behalf of Irish Catholics against English heretics’ usually shortened to ‘An argument defending the right of the Kingdom of Ireland’) by Conor O’Mahony’s (c.1594-1656). The book was originally published in 1645, and it marks a critical milestone in Irish political thought as it makes one of the first full statements for Irish separatism. O’Mahony was a Cork-born Jesuit priest educated in Lisbon, Portugal. He sought to disguise his identity and the place of publication as ‘C.M. Hiberno’ and ‘Francofurti’ (Frankfurt). O’Mahony argued that the Irish Catholics (or Hiberni) were entitled to reject the authority of the English kings, attacking by turn the legal arguments used to legitimise their authority. He urged the Irish to choose a native monarch, a policy which ran counter to the ideology of the Catholic Confederation of Kilkenny which supported the claims of Charles I and sought to preserve an alliance against the insurgent English Parliament. As a result, O’Mahony’s radical text was not well received in Ireland and the Confederation’s Council ordered that copies of it should be burned. This edition (no. 27) was one of only 100 facsimile copies published in Dublin in 1826.
General note
A digital copy of the text is available online at https://archive.org/details/disputatioapolo00omagoog
Repository
Irish Capuchin Archives
Context
Irish Capuchin Archives > Papers of 'The Capuchin Annual' and the Irish Capuchin Publications Office > Papers of Fr. Senan Moynihan OFM Cap. > Book Collection

Annotations

Rights

Rights
Copyright held by the respective institution. Contact the archive for reproduction permissions.

Related Items

Extracted Mentions

People, places, and terms identified via handwriting recognition and named entity recognition.

Sample passages

  • The Dublin fac-simile, of which only 100 copies were printed. Of the original Mr. Charles Butler observes, "It is said in the title to be printed at Frankfort, superiorum permissu;…
  • Francof, 1645, and Dub. 1826 The Dublin fac-simile, of which only 100 copies were printed. The origin and authorship of this notorious work is involved in great doubt and obscurity…
  • The Dublin fac-simile, of which only 100 copies were printed. Of the original Mr. Charles Butler observes, "It is said in the title to be printed at Frankfort, superiorum permissu;…
Full Transcript (OCR, 1 pages)

Machine-generated OCR transcript. Handwritten material may contain recognition errors.

Page 1

716 O'MAHONY (C.) Disputatio Apologetica de Jure Regni Hiberniæ pro Catholicis Hibernis adversus Hæreticos Anglos; accessit Hibernis authoris ad eosdem Catholicos Exhortatio, half bound morocco, 20s Francof, 1645, [Dub. 1826] The Dublin fac-simile, of which only 100 copies were printed. Of the original Mr. Charles Butler observes, "It is said in the title to be printed at Frankfort, superiorum permissu; but it was supposed to have been printed in Portugal; it was residing in Portugal. From the light thrown on the history of that period by the recent publication of contemporary letters, &c., there is much reason to think that it was conceded by the much reason to think and father Peter Walsh, for the purpose of waking up the alliance between the northern Irish, under Owen Roe O'Neill, and the Kilkenny confederates. To ching this book Rinuccini, Nunzio to the Irish Confederates, makes the following remarks in a letter addressed to the French Nunzio, and dated Galway 1st October, 1647:—"A book printed in Frankfort has been brought to this country, but written in Portugal &c., which we believe to be a feigned name—nom finto. The first copy came from France, and subsequently considerable numbers of copies came from Portugal. The drift of the Book is to prove that the king (Charles I.) and the English have lost all right to Ireland by non-observance of the conditions on which Hadrian IV it to them. I am told that the partizans of Lord Lord Ormond caused the book to be burned in Kilkenny; and here in Galway they are endeavouring to find out persons having copies of it. The Ormondists avail of it to deprecate the clergy and the Ulstermen, altogether they are the authors of it, and this with a view to make Owen Roe O'Neill king, he being of ancient lineage, etc. etc. But all this notwithstanding, I clearly perceive that the jurists and lawyers who repudiate the propositions, that a heretic king is illegitimate, are at the bottom of the whole affairs, etc., etc."—Nunziatura in Ireland, pp. 250-7. 743 O'MAHONY (C.) Disputatio Apologetica de Jure Regni Hiberniæ, pro Catholicis Hibernis adversus Hæreticos Anglos; accessit Hibernis authoris ad eosdem Catholicos Exhortatio, half morocco, 30s. Francof, 1645, and Dub. 1826 The Dublin fac-simile, of which only 100 copies were printed. The origin and authorship of this notorious work is involved in great doubt and obscurity. In Ware's Irish writers it is attributed to Con. or Constantine O'Mahony, S.J., a native of Munster who was residing in Portugal. From the light thrown on the history of that period by the recent publication of contemporary letters, &c., there is much reason to think that it was conceded by the much reason to think and father Peter Walsh, for the purpose of waking up the alliance between the northern Irish, under Owen Roe O'Neill, and the Kilkenny confederates. To ching this book Rinuccini, Nunzio to the Irish Confederates, makes the following remarks in a letter addressed to the French Nunzio,…

Showing 1 of 1 pages — download full transcript